UCI MHCID CAPSTONE · CLASS CRUNCHLABS

Making science curriculum easy to adopt

Making science curriculum easy to adopt

A UX case study on redesigning how middle school science teachers discover, evaluate, and use a standards-aligned curriculum—from first search through a validated high-fidelity prototype.

A UX case study on redesigning how middle school science teachers discover, evaluate, and use a standards-aligned curriculum—from first search through a validated high-fidelity prototype.

OUR PARTNER

Who is Class CrunchLabs?

PARTNER

Class CrunchLabs is a free extension of the CrunchLabs brand, a hands-on science kit company.

WHAT THEY OFFER

A complete, standards-aligned physical science curriculum for middle school. 4 units live today, 1 more coming soon, scaling to 90+ planned.

OUR TASK

OUR TASK

Three big questions

Three big questions

01

What was asked of us?

If teachers wanted to invest their time into Class CrunchLabs, they had to read through a long PDF to become acquainted with the system, which proved too long for teachers' short time planning.

02

What needed to be done?

We needed to create a way for teachers to access Class CrunchLabs, be introduced, access materials, and be prepared to teach a lesson, all within one user journey.

03

How would we do it?

To start such a large task, we needed to understand how teachers thought and planned their lessons. We made it our goal to understand their decision-making and thought processes through various avenues of research.

How might we help middle school science teachers onboard faster to Class CrunchLabs by refining the engagement process, streamlining lesson plan integration, and reducing cognitive load through the website itself?

How might we help middle school science teachers onboard faster to Class CrunchLabs by refining the engagement process, streamlining lesson plan integration, and reducing cognitive load through the website itself?

HOW WE GOT THERE

HOW WE GOT THERE

Research methods & findings

Research methods & findings

Six teacher interviews anchored the research, which was reframed midway from "tell us about the website" to "walk me through your last unit," and was supported by a literature review and a 10-tool competitive analysis.

DIAMOND 1: THE PROBLEM

DIAMOND 2: THE SOLUTION

01

Discover

Literature review, competitive analysis, 6 teacher interviews.

02

Define

Affinity + journey mapping → the reframed HMW question.

03

Develop

Ideation, Mild/Medium/Spicy prototypes, Test 1.

04

Deliver

The modularity pivot, hi-fi build, Test 2 (Maze).

“If I need to dig and dig and dig to find what I need, it’s a no. I give up because I need to move on. There’s a fire to put out.”

“If I need to dig and dig and dig to find what I need, it’s a no. I give up because I need to move on. There’s a fire to put out.”

— 5th grade teacher

Reverse planning

Teachers start from the standard, then work backward. The goal has to lead.

Allow customization

Nobody adopts a whole external unit; they grab one activity and drop it in.

Time matters

Teachers are overworked and will ignore a curriculum if it takes too long to figure out how to use

Teachers trust teachers

Confidence comes from other educators, not marketing.

RESULTS

RESULTS

Four design decisions

Four design decisions

Search & Filter, Context, Materials, and Page Navigation & Trust: four decisions the team defended to Class CrunchLabs, each backed by research, forming one funnel from broad context down to what one lesson actually involves.

Class CrunchLabs browse curriculum interface

01 · SEARCH & FILTER

Finding what’s needed

Search Filters, Embedded Materials, and Page Navigation: three decisions the team defended to Class CrunchLabs, each backed by research, forming one funnel from broad context down to what one lesson actually involves.

Research backing: Affinity mapping: "Lesson plans should be easily filtered by factors teachers prioritize, like objectives, topics, and time." Validated in testing: 6.2/7 filter helpfulness.

02 · CONTEXT

What a teacher sees first

Hero, unit overview, the standards-aligned "Three-Dimensional" section, and a Quick Start guide sit together up top: everything a teacher needs to decide this unit is worth their time.

Research backing: Journey mapping: standards identification is stage one of how teachers actually plan a lesson, so the standard and objective had to be the first thing on the page, not buried.

Class CrunchLabs unit overview interface
Class CrunchLabs unit materials interface

03 · EMBEDDED MATERIALS

One place for everything

Teacher and student materials stay visually separate, with an "open all in Google Drive" link. Hands-on challenges get their own swimlane. There's nothing to build and nothing to dig for either.

Research backing: Teacher interviews: pieces, not curricula. Nobody adopts a whole external unit, they grab one activity and drop it in, so materials had to be usable in isolation.

04 · PAGE NAVIGATION

A guided experience

A sticky nav jumps to every section of the unit, next to a "Unit At A Glance" box with one-click links to the Drive folder and supply list, plus a running count of what's inside and a bookmarked items panel.

Research backing: Teacher interviews: teachers trust teachers, confidence comes from clear, navigable structure, not marketing. Confirmed in testing: 0% drop-off/misclicks.

Class CrunchLabs page navigation interface

TESTING & ITERATING

TESTING & ITERATING

What changed & what teachers said

What changed & what teachers said

We ran moderated tests first, then an unmoderated round via Maze, letting teachers work through the finished design on their own. Before the polished build, one idea that research strongly supported was cut, and the team redesigned around the same need instead of quietly dropping it.

Class CrunchLabs' lesson plans currently can't be broken up and reordered, so a true drag-and-drop "Modular System" wasn't buildable this cycle. Two related ideas hit the same wall: a navigational sidebar and a standalone bookmark-and-save feature both tested well but stayed concepts rather than a full path.

All three stayed real, tested design work; none of them shipped as originally scoped.

0%

drop-off / misclicks

6.2/7

filter helpfulness

6/6

would use the site

3.3/7

Amazing Cast usage

FLAGGED NOTES

Flagged note

Weak feature adoption: the Amazing Cast swimlane scored only 3.3/7 on how often teachers said they'd use it.

Flagged note

Named, not hidden: a teacher with zero prep periods said there's "still a lot to digest." Centralized findability helped, but didn't fully solve the time problem.